[REBOL] Re: Parse and and recursion local variables?
From: petr:krenzelok:trz:cz at: 20-Mar-2007 7:21
Christian Ensel wrote:
>> Christian, actually what I had in mind was "the index" kind of thing
>> applying FIRST occurance of rule1 | rule 2 | etc. IIRC, when I first
>> proposed addition of above, I called new word inside parse dialect
> Petr, yes, I imagined FIRST too, but then had difficulties coming up
> with a second (no pun intended) word to go for the difference between TO
> and THRU. Hence the refinement suggestion.
Christian, the problem is, that 'parse can't handle paths, or am I
wrong? So - the refinement way is unlikely. But maybe I am wrong? Could
anyone elaborate, if our keywords could use refinements eventually?