[REBOL] Re: R: Re: Correct Behaviour? Was False = 2 ????
From: sqlab:gmx at: 3-Jul-2001 12:47
> Everybody,
>
> Interesting to note peoples points and reasonings
> on this thread & for what it's worth I think they
> all have some validity.
>
Although it's not my way to join these kinds of discussion,
I feel proned to add my comments.
Why should everything seen from the view of C?
Other languages use other index's offsets or logical
representations.
I am always glad, when there is no need
to recalculate length, offset and position as in C.
The Rebol way fits me enough.
Regarding the numeric values of logic values,
I do not care for the values, but if I should decide
I would choose zero for 'NULL. postive values
for true and negative for false.
There are more things between heaven and earth.)
AR
