Mailing List Archive: 49091 messages
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search


From: cyphre:volny:cz at: 31-Aug-2001 9:29

> Thoughts/Debate ... > Should View's sound handling and move to the free version? > Since there is a commercial license is there still a need for a View and > View/Pro difference. > Could sufficient revenue be generate from a commercial use pays model? >
I don't understand why sound feature is only in /Pro version. As I'm doing electronic music/fx for about 10 years(some old czech just for hobby with my friend Rebolek in our little studio) I cannot understand what RT thinks "proffesional" on simple playing samples? I would accept sound feature in /Pro version only when it would have been made in "Pro" style. For example: programmable mixer with support of basic effects like delay, reverb, distortion...,native fourier transform support(very useful for programming own effect processors), MP3 format support, different kind of sound port buffering, streaming possibility etc. I think that a lot of users who buy /Pro key looking for current sound ability will be dissapointed..."50 bucks for replaying samples???"...and this is not really good for RT. Another issue is Rebol browser plug-in...Will RT sell /Pro plug-ins for users who wants to hear sound in their lovely reblets?? Sounds like bad joke ;-) RT: LET THE SOUND BE FREE!!! Cyphre