[REBOL] Re: dbms3.r 01
From: g:santilli:tiscalinet:it at: 14-Jan-2002 22:00
On 14-Gen-02, you wrote:
RT> 1) I like to have a function to update the db. Until the
RT> funtions call all the changes should resides in memory or in
RT> a temp file.
I didn't want to use any cache in dbms.r to minimize data loss on
crashes. Maybe we could use memory tables in dbms3.r for something
RT> 2) I do not like to use a dir for a db. Neither to use a dir
RT> name for a db name. My preference is for basename.
Yes... when I started it i thought: "well, let's start with a
simple file stucture, and extend later". (I wanted it for a
mailer, so not much rows per table.) I never got around to extend
it... I'll do it now with version 3. :)
RT> 3) I should like a
RT> db-select dbname none
It's equivalent to:
RT> 4) I do not like 1 record 1 file: on Windows cluster are of
RT> 32-64kb (what a beatiful thing!) but i know changing this is
RT> your actual first target.
Indeed, same reason.
RT> 5) Do you keep in memory Columns and indexes?
Nope, that was one of the things "I'll do it later"... :)
Gabriele Santilli <[giesse--writeme--com]> - Amigan - REBOL programmer
Amiga Group Italia sez. L'Aquila -- http://www.amyresource.it/AGI/