[REBOL] Re: Wiki (was) Re: beginner's docs missing onRT'swebsite
From: chris:langreiter at: 22-Jun-2001 20:42
> Needless to say. However, it's pretty easy to arrange to save enough
backups
> (daily, say, for the whole system) and as often as you want for
contributions
> you are actively involved in, so it's pretty easy to repair if there is a
`rogue'.
I've been running http://www.langreiter.com, a site with ~ 1200 page views
per day*, with the unprotected Vanilla version 0.3.6
(http://www.langreiter.com/vanilla) since over a year now. It just works.
I've experienced vandalism exactly __once__ (only 2-3 snips, though).
> Net, nobody bothers to screw things up as there's really no point in doing
so, though
> once in a while an `errant' edit will cause some otherwise good-willed
person to
> screw up.
>
> All-in-all the hassle of worrying about `protection' proves to be more
trouble than
> just fixing things up when things go awry...
And if you really need password protection, Vanilla 0.5 with its user
registration and session system will accomodate your needs. Have a look at
it at http://213.229.9.170.
Thanks David for the praise, BTW ;-)
Best regards,
-- Chris
* 335603 more pages served by REBOL! ;-)
