[REBOL] Re: ubf for Rebol?
From: joel:neely:fedex at: 12-Nov-2002 14:04
Hi, Bryan,
Since you mention it... ;-)
bryan wrote:
> My opinion is basically that is presents a simple and extensible
> language for describing binary information. The comparison to
> Soap or XML-RPC is appropriate to UBF(B) which has a protocol
> description language...
> ... If I were to be working on any heavy telephony
> apps erlang would probably be my choice. Also has very nice
> libraries for working with ASN.1
>
OK, we've got XML for human-readable structure/content, and ASN-1 for
binary structure/content. Why do we need YAML? (Just curious!)
-jn-
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Joel Neely joelDOTneelyATfedexDOTcom 901-263-4446
