Mailing List Archive: 49091 messages
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search

[REBOL] Re: Comments about make-doc-pro?

From: cybarite:sympatico:ca at: 11-Aug-2001 19:29

At 03:05 PM 8/11/01 -0400, [DNess--Home--Com] wrote:
>Mike Myers wrote: > > > > You can review them if you like at > > > > > > > >This is nice, but it would appear, flawed. > >At least when I view it the document header indicates a section 9, and >yet the document itself dies ungraciously early in section 8. > >Not that it matters much, but the document also has a very poor internal HTML >structure, as least if you look at it from the viewpoint of the various >validators >that you can pass such documents through. If this is to be a `public' >facility it >would seem to be a good idea to at least attempt to conform to widely-shared >standards.
Thanks for the comments David. I looked at doctor html ( and am very impressed with the analysis it gives. So I'll have a go at cleaning up my html exceptions it throws. I did post them so that Robert Muench might consider any of the approaches in his make-doc-pro script. Making them readable might help sway him to implement some of them. but I have been thinking that using Carl's easyvid.r dialect is a better communication vehicle for an audience that has acces to View.