[REBOL] Re: Comments about make-doc-pro?
From: cybarite:sympatico:ca at: 11-Aug-2001 19:29
At 03:05 PM 8/11/01 -0400, [DNess--Home--Com] wrote:
>Mike Myers wrote:
> >
> > You can review them if you like at
> >
> > http://www.cybarite.com/public/make-doc-enhancements.html
> >
>
>This is nice, but it would appear, flawed.
>
>At least when I view it the document header indicates a section 9, and
>yet the document itself dies ungraciously early in section 8.
>
>Not that it matters much, but the document also has a very poor internal HTML
>structure, as least if you look at it from the viewpoint of the various
>validators
>that you can pass such documents through. If this is to be a `public'
>facility it
>would seem to be a good idea to at least attempt to conform to widely-shared
>standards.
Thanks for the comments David. I looked at doctor html
(http://www2.imagiware.com/RxHTML/)
and am very impressed with the analysis it gives.
So I'll have a go at cleaning up my html exceptions it throws.
I did post them so that Robert Muench might consider any of the approaches
in his make-doc-pro script. Making them readable might help sway
him to implement some of them.
but I have been thinking that using Carl's easyvid.r dialect is a better
communication
vehicle for an audience that has acces to View.
