[REBOL] Re: RFC on support for user-defined "types"
From: ammon:rcslv at: 9-Jun-2002 23:19
A short time ago, Joel Neely, sent an email stating:
> Hi, Gregg,
> Gregg Irwin wrote:
> > What about specifying a prototype object instead of a block of
> > words for an anonymous object? I'm thinking that the list of
> > words could get quite long and perhaps be used in many places
> > which might become burdensome.
> Actually, I'd prefer to say "What about specifying a prototype object
> *or* a block of words..." because I can think of specific examples
> where each might be more convenient.
I thought that is what he was saying...
> > Just my 2% of $1.00 :)
> Just my 1% of $2.00 ;-)
Just my 4% of $0.50 ;-))