[REBOL] Re: RFC on support for user-defined "types"
From: joel:neely:fedex at: 11-Jun-2002 17:33
Gregg Irwin wrote:
> What about specifying a prototype object instead of a block of
> words for an anonymous object? I'm thinking that the list of
> words could get quite long and perhaps be used in many places
> which might become burdensome.
Actually, I'd prefer to say "What about specifying a prototype object
*or* a block of words..." because I can think of specific examples
where each might be more convenient.
> Just my 2% of $1.00 :)
Just my 1% of $2.00 ;-)