[REBOL] Re: newlines
From: nitsch-lists:netcologne at: 13-Nov-2001 20:31
RE: [REBOL] Re: newlines
Hi Ladislav,
yes, i know, i forgot some lines..
a bit dicussion:
- i was surprised to have the fastest algorithm.
i tried to be simple,
and to reduce the lots of large movements of remove-solutions.
- i think the handling is in response of the user.
'copy yourself if needed is rebol-style..
because often there is something parsed
and completely handled, before the function is called again.
used that way there is no need to copy the result.
if there is need, [copy INS1 text] is short.
OTOH similar one could claim the remove-solutions destroy the string,
so they should copy first? ;-)
- instead of post-allocation like [copy out],
i could do [insert clear s out] without allocations.
which may trigger some gc when lots of
benchmark-loops.
could you benchmark this two solutions too please?
-Volker
-
[lmecir--mbox--vol--cz] wrote: