[REBOL] Re: Always more and more show places for REBOL ... another opportunity!
From: carl:cybercraft at: 11-Feb-2004 8:25
On 11-Feb-04, Gerard Cote wrote:
> Hi List,
> here is another programming languages list produced a couple of
> years ago and as such it is not great news. What is interesting
> however is that it includes and describes well enough REBOL and
> second it lists - immediately after the loooong listing of the
> different languages - many other software places on the WEB where
> the REBOL name/description could be sent too if not already done.
> I had no time recently to look further but may be we could split the
> list between many members and use some shared REBOL description to
> post to. This would save each one some time and we could
> individually reuse this shared view when presenting REBOL to new
> friends ;-)
> If nobody wants to be voluntary for this task, I'll take time to do
> it when I'll have som myself - later when my tutorial is finished or
> at least when more work is done related to it.
If you do, try and "define" REBOL on a few sites. "define" is one of
Google's key words. Try typing "define perl" into Google to see what
I mean. Google doesn't have a definition for REBOL yet though, so we
need to trick it into having a good one.
Hmmm - just noticed such Google definitions seem to be mostly taken
from glossary pages, (perl's a good example:
http://www.google.co.nz/search?q=define:Perl ), so finding the right
glossary to add REBOL to would be the way to achieve this.