ENOUGH already
[1/10] from: grantwparks:yaho:o at: 24-Sep-2000 19:37
Puh-lease! I subscribed to this list to learn REBOL
from those of you who are so well-versed in it and
have explored very advanced topics with it. But more
and more, I have to wade through 20+ postings
regarding opinions on marketing, open-source,
comparison of platforms (each with lots of 'proof' to
back it up), etc, to find one posting with some
programming information. Notwithstanding that there
are good points being made, there is also way too much
unresolvable opposing philosophies; sort of like
talking religion or politics - and you know where that
gets you. I'm not saying limit it strictly to coding
questions and examples, because I think discussions on
collaborative efforts to build a few killer apps is
fruitful, but maybe there should be another list for
all the discussions about what RT 'should' do. I am
simply happy to have such a language which is so new
and different and powerful. I mean no offense, but
how many of us who are so smart about what RT needs to
do to be successful could have done what they've done?
It's human nature to look at what exists and see
'what's missing' or how things should be, but that
angle becomes fruitless when it degenerates into long
historical justifications.
I realize this has been somewhat of a rant, and let me
reiterate that I learned a lot from the list in its
earlier days, but it has become not very useful in the
past few weeks. Can we get back to being more
on-topic?
Respectfully (and I mean that),
Grant
[2/10] from: petr:krenzelok:trz:cz at: 25-Sep-2000 6:44
[grantwparks--yahoo--com] wrote:
> Puh-lease! I subscribed to this list to learn REBOL
> from those of you who are so well-versed in it and
<<quoted lines omitted: 4>>
> back it up), etc, to find one posting with some
> programming information.
I don't defend comparison of platforms, but with bad marketing, you can
kill the product sooner than later. I offered RT to set-up separate ml
for those interesting to discuss marketing etc. issues, but guess if I
got reply to my email? ;-/
> Notwithstanding that there
> are good points being made, there is also way too much
<<quoted lines omitted: 9>>
> how many of us who are so smart about what RT needs to
> do to be successful could have done what they've done?
If you say something like that, then you always very cleverly block ppl
from having right to their own opinion ...
> It's human nature to look at what exists and see
> 'what's missing' or how things should be, but that
<<quoted lines omitted: 5>>
> past few weeks. Can we get back to being more
> on-topic?
Maybe we would like to be, but as for me - I can't. What do you use/want
to use REBOL for? Some of us needs to know at least something about
directions, and that mean even marketing. You know what? - do you think
the discussion would be occuring if RT would answer at least basic
questions? I just wonder how many ppl actually ordered /Command not even
remotely knowing, what does the licence agreeement look like ....
-pekr-
[3/10] from: gschwarz:netconnect:au at: 25-Sep-2000 15:47
I strongly agree.
Greg
Grant wrote,
[4/10] from: webdev:accglobal at: 25-Sep-2000 1:21
You read my mind!
SNR is definitely swinging into the negative numbers.
All things being equal I would like to take this opportunity to express my
humble gratitude to those that have answered my questions (as well as those
of others) so expeditiously and with such charity.
On the flip side...
Although some of you are perhaps very clever and capable individuals I think
you are pissing in the wind. Such pursuits have their own cathartic merits,
but might I mention the rest of us are getting little wet about now. And no
doubt we all have heard the familiar chant that "If wishes were horses
beggars would ride". And perhaps if Jules Verne were an engineer rather than
a visionary writer he would have hung himself out of frustration, attempting
to cobble his dreams in the wrong century.
Any fool can turn a house into a pile of stones but its far rarer to find a
man who can turn a pile of stones into a house. If Carl and company can
build a house then the least we can do is mix the mortar without too much
water and sand.
Need I say more?
I remain respectfully yours,
[webdev--accglobal--net]
[5/10] from: news:ted:husted at: 25-Sep-2000 6:57
> I'm not saying limit it strictly to coding questions and examples,
because I think discussions on collaborative efforts to build a few
killer apps is fruitful, but maybe there should be another list for all
the discussions about what RT 'should' do.
I also strongly agree. Realistically, there whould be a list for for
each package (/CORE, /VIEW, /COMMAND, and the Apache list), along with
Advocacy (convert ALLY?).
-Ted.
Of course, realistically, there should also be a bug-list and
knowledgebase.
[6/10] from: joel:neely:fedex at: 25-Sep-2000 7:52
Hi, Grant!
[grantwparks--yahoo--com] wrote:
> ... I'm not saying limit it strictly to coding
> questions and examples, because I think discussions on
> collaborative efforts to build a few killer apps is
> fruitful, but maybe there should be another list for
> all the discussions about what RT 'should' do.
>
Am I the only one who caught the irony here? A post that
asserts that there's too much discussion "about what RT
'should' do" contains the suggestion that "there should be
another list"! As RT is hosting the mailing list, this
suggestion provides another thing RT "should" do! ;-)
> I am simply happy to have such a language which is so
> new and different and powerful.
>
I am happy to have REBOL, as well. However, the traffic
on this list has always included suggestions for what RT
could/should do to make the language more powerful, or at
least more responsive to people's specific needs.
Some of these issues (e.g., compiling to byte-code or
other non-source form) have to do BOTH with the technical
capabilities of the language, AND with RT policy and
long-term plans. Members of this list should be able to
express themselves on such issues, as they ultimately
affect us all.
Some of the members of this list have expended much-
greater-than-average effort toward REBOL advocacy, a
subject that ultimately affects all of us -- wider usage
of REBOL translates into less risk of losing a language
of which we are all fond. But taking an advocacy
position causes one to have a greater need to understand
the answer to "Whither REBOL?"
Some of the components of this question (e.g., long-term
pricing and product stragegies, including definitions of
future products) are more about the position RT wishes to
occupy in the computing industry than about technical
details, but there is still SOME overlap.
Members of this list (especially the ones who are taking
publicly visible positions of REBOL advocacy or who are
trying to drive behind-the-scenes decisions that affect
REBOL adpotion) should be able to ask that question, and
be able to express opinions regarding the relative merits
of various possible answers, as this question affects us
all.
My experience has been that reading (or participating in)
the discussions of all of the above usually forces me to
clarify my own thoughts and introduces me to ideas of
others that I would never have had on my own. YMMV.
> I mean no offense, but how many of us who are so smart
> about what RT needs to do to be successful could have
> done what they've done?
>
I mean no offense either, but REBOL has reached a point
in its life where the visible part of "what they've done"
thus far probably has less to do with the long-term
viability of REBOL as a professional programming language
than what they're going to do next -- and that's not just
technical in nature.
RT has been very patient with a wide range of suggestions
and discussions (technical or otherwise) on this list.
The "old hands" on this list have been very patient with
suggestions, discussions, and questions (mostly technical
and elementary) from the new/newer/newest members (which
includes me). I suggest that we all have patience with
discussions which may not interest all of us equally, but
which are usually important to the participants. In the
extreme case, I find the Subject: header a valuable clue
as to whether I want to invest time in reading a post.
OBTW, I also agree that, beyond a certain point, beating
a dead horse is not only unproductive, but downright
disgusting!!!
(Unless, of course, you're tenderizing horse steaks! ;-)
-jn-
[7/10] from: capolunghi::att::com at: 25-Sep-2000 11:16
Perhaps what's needed is a new ['JustcodeList--rebol--com'] Maybe that would do
it.
Joe
[8/10] from: petr:krenzelok:trz:cz at: 25-Sep-2000 17:39
----- Original Message -----
From: <[capolunghi--att--com]>
To: <[list--rebol--com]>
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2000 5:16 PM
Subject: [REBOL] ENOUGH already Re:
> Perhaps what's needed is a new ['JustcodeList--rebol--com'] Maybe that would
do
> it.
I would dare to suggest to take it easy and don't complicate the situation
:-) Or just implement 'just-code-list plug-in for rebmail project, with
syntax hilighting etc. stuff ;-)
Cheers,
-pekr-
[9/10] from: ryanc:iesco-dms at: 25-Sep-2000 10:11
Thanks for bringing this up Grant. Since this list is not threaded, we
all have to put up with painfully uninteristing/border line off topic
posts from time to time. I will try to keep a closer eye on what I
post. Hopefully there will be a better way soon to conduct our
discussions.
A big tick for threaded discussion list.
--Ryan
Ryan Cole
Programmer Analyst
www.iesco-dms.com
707-468-5400
I am enough of an artist to draw freely upon my imagination.
Imagination is more important than knowledge. Knowledge is
limited. Imagination encircles the world.
-Einstein
[10/10] from: brett:codeconscious at: 26-Sep-2000 15:31
The number of "painfully uninteristing/border line off topic posts" that
I've seen on this list is close to zero, so obviously your definition of off
topic is different from mine.
This list represents a community of people, obviously with a variety of
goals, who are interested in Rebol not just programs.
RT's description of this list:
"General Discussion List
This is an open, unmoderated discussion list for REBOL developers. It
provides a constant flow of information, examples, and opinions. ..."
This list is also represents an unofficial flow of information back to RT,
who have demonstrated their interest in the ideas and contributions of the
participants on this list.
I'd rather someone start a thread on a topic they are interested in than
winge that others are not talking about that person's pet topics. If there
are enough sub-groups fine. Manage it with constructive suggestions/action
rather than complain.
Brett.
Notes
- Quoted lines have been omitted from some messages.
View the message alone to see the lines that have been omitted