Testing

[1/7] from: Izkata::Comcast::net at: 22-Dec-2004 11:11

Yet it did! =^.^=

[2/7] from: hallvard:ystad:oops-as:no at: 22-Dec-2004 22:57

Yes, you have received it. I haven't. There's no trace of it here: http://www.opensubscriber.com/message/[rebolist--rebol--com]/333855.html or here: http://www.rebol.org/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/rebol/ml-month-index.r?month=200412 There seems to be a difference in mail handling depending on wheter mail is sent with mime encoded headers or not. HY Dixit Izkata (18.11 22.12.2004):

[3/7] from: SunandaDH::aol::com at: 22-Dec-2004 16:56

Hallvard,

> http://www.rebol.org/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/rebol/ml-month-index.r?month=200412

It probably won't get there for a while. We've throttled back the archiving and indexing of messages because of the holes in the mailing list. I'd rather we waited and archived all messages in their correct order, than in the strange time-displaced sequence they have been appearing. On the other hand, it may never appear. The MLA is, in effect, just a member of the ML. And, as we all know, not all members are getting all messages. Sunanda

[4/7] from: carl:cybercraft at: 23-Dec-2004 23:22

On Sunday, 19-December-2004 at 10:13:29 Hallvard wrote,

>I fear this message will never reach the list.

You worry too much. ;-) -- Carl Read.

[5/7] from: hallvard:ystad:oops-as:no at: 23-Dec-2004 22:00

Hi Peter and everyone, OK, this message, that some folks already have received, finally arrived in my box tonight. Here are the facts: Received by mail.rebol.net: Received: from [195.204.121.13] (helo=mail.oops-as.no) by gs5.inmotionhosting.com with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1Cfx85-0002JN-S5 for [rebolist--rebol--com]; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 01:13:30 -0800 Received: from [80.203.65.44] (account <[hallvard--ystad--mail--oops-as--no]>) by mail.oops-as.no (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.1.1) with HTTP id 1720206 for [rebolist--rebol--com]; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 10:13:29 +0100 OK, so far, so good. gs5.inmotionhosting.com received the message about immediately. Then: Received: from gs5.inmotionhosting.com (gs5.inmotionhosting.com [216.193.197.238]) by mail.rebol.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82F7D4299 for <[rebolist--rebol--net]>; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 04:07:47 -0500 (EST) Uh-oh. What happened with the message for almost three hours? Police interrogations? OK, once the interrogations are over (obviously, this was not a suicide bomber email), pass it on to Ecartis: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list rebol); Sun, 19 Dec 2004 04:07:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.rebol.net (mail.rebol.net [209.167.34.210]) by mail.rebol.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94A8A49C2; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 04:07:49 -0500 (EST) Then, four days later: Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 209.167.34.210 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of [rebol-bounce--rebol--com]) Received: from mail.rebol.net (neo.rtwconsulting.com [209.167.34.210]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 58si186365rnc; Thu, 23 Dec 2004 06:18:37 -0800 (PST) .... So what went on on 209.167.34.210 for four days? Hallvard Dixit Hallvard Ystad (10.13 19.12.2004):

[6/7] from: pwawood::mango::net::my at: 24-Dec-2004 7:02

Hallvard

>>... So what went on on 209.167.34.210 for four days?

A good question. I'll pass it on to RT. Regards Peter -- Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.

[7/7] from: AJMartin:orcon at: 6-Mar-2005 10:52

Ping! It reached me. :) --- Andrew Martin