Rebol & Linux
[1/10] from: rebol665:ifrance at: 2-Jun-2002 15:54
Hi rebollers,
I am just curious what system is used by the rebol community. I was a
Windows guy, and I am "starting a new life" with Linux.
So which is yours ?
Patrick
PS: Some will notice that this message is send from Windows because I am
still fighting with PPP but I hope to read yours answers from Linux.
[2/10] from: anton:lexicon at: 3-Jun-2002 1:36
I am still running Windows 2k, but plan to shift over
to linux at an appropriate moment.
(Probably the next major hard disk crash.)
Rebol Technology tend to release their latest beta offerings
on windows first, and linux a close second.
Anton.
[3/10] from: jason:cunliffe:verizon at: 2-Jun-2002 12:47
> I am just curious what system is used by the rebol community. I was a
> Windows guy, and I am "starting a new life" with Linux.
>
> So which is yours ?
server: RedHat 7.2
laptop: Win98
[4/10] from: atruter:hih:au at: 3-Jun-2002 9:38
> I am just curious what system is used by the rebol community. I was a
> Windows guy, and I am "starting a new life" with Linux.
Win95 at work
Win2000 and RedHat7.2 at home
MacOS/X if RT ever release view for it (Wintel boxes are really noisy once
you remove the background noise!)
Regards,
Ashley
[5/10] from: rgaither:triad:rr at: 2-Jun-2002 20:51
>> I am just curious what system is used by the rebol community. I was a
>> Windows guy, and I am "starting a new life" with Linux.
<<quoted lines omitted: 3>>
> once
> you remove the background noise!)
Work Desktop - Win2000
Work Server - Solaris
Home Desktop - Win98
Home Server - Red Hat 7.2
Home Both :-) - Mac OS X
I too would love to see an OS X version of view!
Rod.
Rod Gaither
[rgaither--triad--rr--com]
Oak Ridge, NC USA
[6/10] from: lgiddings:optushome:au at: 3-Jun-2002 12:29
Win95 at work
Previously Win2000 at home, I am running MacOS/X now
and waiting waiting waiting for RT to release view for it, like a few
other people I know :)
regards
Laurence
On Sunday, June 2, 2002, at 11:54 , pat665 wrote:
[7/10] from: greggirwin:mindspring at: 3-Jun-2002 10:06
Hi Pat,
<< I am just curious what system is used by the rebol community. I was a
Windows guy, and I am "starting a new life" with Linux. >>
W2K.
--Gregg
[8/10] from: mark:jobstreet at: 4-Jun-2002 10:57
Desktop for program development: Win2k
Work server for running Rebol program: Linux 7.1
> Hi rebollers,
> I am just curious what system is used by the rebol community. I was a
<<quoted lines omitted: 11>>
> [rebol-request--rebol--com] with "unsubscribe" in the
> subject, without the quotes.
Mark Chang - [mark--jobstreet--com]
Founder of JobStreet.com,
www.jobstreet.com
250 Tanjong Pagar Road
#11-01 St Andrew's Centre
Singapore 088541
Fax: 65-538 0090
Tel: 65-538 0060
#1 Ground Floor Office,
Equatorial Penang,
1 Jalan bukit Jambul, 11900 Penang
Malaysia.
Fax: 604 643 6461
Tel: 604 644 5912
[9/10] from: tim::johnsons-web::com at: 3-Jun-2002 19:46
* pat665 <[rebol665--ifrance--com]> [020602 06:23]:
> Hi rebollers,
>
> I am just curious what system is used by the rebol community. I was a
> Windows guy, and I am "starting a new life" with Linux.
>
> So which is yours ?
> Patrick
Hi Patrick:
My main workstation is Linux Red Hat 7.2 running Windows 98
at the same time on another "virtual desktop" using Win4Lin 3.0
(with the same file system "underneath").
I use rebol primarily for CGI, and I test with Apache.
I alternately test when necessary from other Windows
machines on my network using Microsoft Personal Web Server.
Win4Lin 3.0 has a 'vnet' option that allows me to
configure a "virtual machine" on the same machine.
I have not yet used that option.
I have found that my current version of rebol/core
(2.5.0.4.2 on Linux, and the corresponding windows versions
on the other machines have some differences in the way
that CGI/path-info) is interpreted.
I've coded to resolve those differences
I am a partner in a small company. My other partner is
primarily a perl programmer. He indicates that he finds
differences in stability between Windows and Linux ports
to perl.
I do not find such differences in stability in my configuration,
between different ports of rebol, that is to say:
I find rebol equally stable accross both platforms.
(disclaimer, I'm simply being anecdotal here, I have no
formal benchmarks)
> PS: Some will notice that this message is send from Windows because I am
> still fighting with PPP but I hope to read yours answers from Linux.
(MTA = Mutt)
-tj-
> ______________________________________________________________________________
> ifrance.com, l'email gratuit le plus complet de l'Internet !
> vos emails depuis un navigateur, en POP3, sur Minitel, sur le WAP...
> http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/email.emailif
P.S.
I have heard that rebol is very big in France. I hope that the US
will catch up. :-)
--
Tim Johnson <[tim--johnsons-web--com]>
http://www.alaska-internet-solutions.com
http://www.johnsons-web.com
[10/10] from: oliva:david:seznam:cz at: 12-Jun-2002 13:48
Hello pat665,
Sunday, June 2, 2002, 3:54:34 PM, you wrote:
p> So which is yours ?
Server: RedHat with Apache
desktop: WinNT4 with Apache
I have no problems with moving scripts from Win to Lin and vice
versa (just use a simple script for replacing paths in the files to fit in the
target environment)
Notes
- Quoted lines have been omitted from some messages.
View the message alone to see the lines that have been omitted