Mailing List Archive: 49091 messages
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

'none in System objects

 [1/10] from: bo:rebol at: 12-Feb-2001 11:38


First of all, it would be a lot nicer if I rewrote it now. Also, it would be even nicer if Holger or one of my other wonderful co-workers rewrote it as it could be a lot friendlier. The original purpose was to allow users to modify their system object and save their changes to their user.r file, but it seems to have become popular for browsing the system object. Jeff wrote a much neater CGI version of the system browser at one point. -Bo On 12-Feb-2001/9:22:52-8:00, [jeff--rebol--net] wrote:
> Howdy, Mark: >> For best results exploring system-object see holger's
<<quoted lines omitted: 6>>
>[rebol-request--rebol--com] with "unsubscribe" in the >subject, without the quotes.
-- Bohdan "Bo" Lechnowsky REBOL Adventure Guide REBOL Technologies 707-467-8000 (http://www.rebol.com) The Official Source for REBOL Books (http://www.REBOLpress.com)

 [2/10] from: jeff::rebol::net at: 12-Feb-2001 14:04


Rather than someone else at RT rework your system-browser, since there's a few too many things to get done right now.. maybe one of the fine REBOL developers of the world would make a VIEW based system-browser (which of course means that they'll have to create a really good lightweight tree viewer in VIEW ha ha ha-- aren't I sneaky).. -jeff

 [3/10] from: gjones05:mail:orion at: 12-Feb-2001 16:51


From: jeff
> Rather than someone else at RT rework your system-browser, > since there's a few too many things to get done right
<<quoted lines omitted: 3>>
> tree viewer in VIEW ha ha ha-- aren't I sneaky).. > -jeff
Darn, Jeff, and I just wrote that file to a folder called /dev/null and I can't find it anywhere!!! --Scott

 [4/10] from: jeff:rebol at: 12-Feb-2001 16:25


>> ... they'll have to create a really good lightweight >> tree viewer in VIEW ha ha ha-- aren't I sneaky).. > > Darn, Jeff, and I just wrote that file to a folder called > /dev/null and I can't find it anywhere!!! > > --Scott
Welp, guess you'll have to go in after it!! :-) Quick tie this rope around your waist and in you go. We'll hold on tight and pull you back up when you fetch it! (-: -jeff

 [5/10] from: ptretter:norcom2000 at: 12-Feb-2001 8:27


Anyone know why I get 'none on every third item within System objects such as system/components as in: mold system/components/3 == "none" mold system/components/6 == "none" mold system/components/9 == "none" Paul Tretter

 [6/10] from: gjones05:mail:orion at: 12-Feb-2001 9:58


Hi, Paul, Good question. I've wondered essentially the same thing but from a different perspective. In reading the source, the "components" is a block. The values seem to run in triads of a name, an make! object and then the word none. For example the first triple contains, first, protocols, then the make object! and then none. The definition in the make object! contains an attribute called Name. The Name attribute is set to the same word as the first component of the triplet. So I figured that are evaluated in triples, but I can't figure out where the evaluating is taking place, unless this occurs at a "native" level. I wonder if the native component does a select for each component, does a make object and then ..... And I can't figure out the "significance" of the none. Later in vid-styles, a similar block structuring occurs, but in doubles with no 'none. I also hope someone who "knows" will fill us in if possible. Just my 2 cents. And just curious myself. --Scott

 [7/10] from: robbo1mark:aol at: 12-Feb-2001 11:07


Paul, you get none becuase these values are set as none. For best results exploring system-object see holger's browse-system.r script from the library

 [8/10] from: ptretter:norcom2000 at: 12-Feb-2001 10:23


But what values are set as none. I do see that this section is essentially a block! Why is Protocols not a set-word! datatype. It seems that the object wouldn't be set to 'protocols at all but it is. Which turns out to be object! So the 'none is still a mystery to me. Paul Tretter

 [9/10] from: petr:krenzelok:trz:cz at: 12-Feb-2001 18:17


----- Original Message ----- From: <[Robbo1Mark--aol--com]> To: <[rebol-list--rebol--com]> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 5:07 PM Subject: [REBOL] Re: 'none in System objects
> Paul, > > you get none becuase these values are set as none. > > For best results exploring system-object see holger's browse-system.r
script from the library The name of the script is OK, just credits go to Bo :-) -pekr-

 [10/10] from: jeff:rebol at: 12-Feb-2001 9:22


Howdy, Mark:
> For best results exploring system-object see holger's > browse-system.r script from the library
That's not Holger's, but Bo Lechnowsky's world famous and internationally renown system browser. -jeff

Notes
  • Quoted lines have been omitted from some messages.
    View the message alone to see the lines that have been omitted