[SOAP WebDAV] SOAP and WebDAV bits

Hello all, I know Graham has done some SOAP stuff, and there are some ML archive resources on REBOL.org, but I haven't found what I would call a definitive reference. Has anyone pursued a SOAP or WebDAV interface in depth? Graham? Thanks! -- Gregg

Gregg After all that discussion we had in the early 2000s regarding SOAP, unfortunately nothing ever came from that. After all those years I didn't need to use SOAP again until this past month. I made some changes to the http-prot.r ( see http://rebol.wik.is/Protocols/Http ) So, I can do this read/custom url reduce [ 'soap payload [ soapaction: "" ]] where payload is the xml soap message. I am using rebelxml.r from the library to construct messages and deconstruct the results. Pretty much everything is done by hand ... no automated tools to read the xsd etc. rebelxml.r can't read messages with namespaces eg. <ns:blah ... > and so Maxim has suggested you do a search and replace on the XML result to remove all the namespaces prior to parsing with rebelxml On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 5:00 AM, Gregg Irwin <gregg-pointillistic.com> wrote:

> Hello all, > I know Graham has done some SOAP stuff, and there are some ML archive > To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to > lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.

Hi Graham, GC> I made some changes to the http-prot.r (see GC> http://rebol.wik.is/Protocols/Http) GC> So, I can do this GC> read/custom url reduce [ 'soap payload [ soapaction: "" ]] GC> where payload is the xml soap message. Thanks Graham! I haven't needed it until now either, and it's a backup plan if another interface can't be made to work to talk to an MS Exchange server. It looks like all the old interfaces are being deprecated in favor of the SOAP-based web services interface to it, so it may be the future in any case. -- Gregg

On Sunday 16 November 2008, Gregg Irwin wrote:

> Hi Graham, > GC> I made some changes to the http-prot.r (see > deprecated in favor of the SOAP-based web services interface to it, so > it may be the future in any case.