Always more and more show places for REBOL ... another opportunity!
[1/2] from: gerardcote::sympatico::ca at: 10-Feb-2004 11:38
Hi List, here is another programming languages list produced a couple of years ago and as such it is not great news. What is interesting however is that it includes and describes well enough REBOL and second it lists - immediately after the loooong listing of the different languages - many other software places on the WEB where the REBOL name/description could be sent too if not already done. I had no time recently to look further but may be we could split the list between many members and use some shared REBOL description to post to. This would save each one some time and we could individually reuse this shared view when presenting REBOL to new friends ;-) If nobody wants to be voluntary for this task, I'll take time to do it when I'll have som myself - later when my tutorial is finished or at least when more work is done related to it. Regards, Gerard http://www.hypernews.org/HyperNews/get/computing/lang-list.html
[2/2] from: carl:cybercraft at: 11-Feb-2004 8:25
On 11-Feb-04, Gerard Cote wrote:
> Hi List, > here is another programming languages list produced a couple of
<<quoted lines omitted: 11>>> it when I'll have som myself - later when my tutorial is finished or > at least when more work is done related to it.
If you do, try and "define" REBOL on a few sites. "define" is one of Google's key words. Try typing "define perl" into Google to see what I mean. Google doesn't have a definition for REBOL yet though, so we need to trick it into having a good one. Hmmm - just noticed such Google definitions seem to be mostly taken from glossary pages, (perl's a good example: http://www.google.co.nz/search?q=define:Perl ), so finding the right glossary to add REBOL to would be the way to achieve this.
> Regards, > Gerard > http://www.hypernews.org/HyperNews/get/computing/lang-list.html
-- Carl Read
- Quoted lines have been omitted from some messages.
View the message alone to see the lines that have been omitted