[REBOL] Re: Bug! in assignment to date! values with stacked set-pathvalues
From: lmecir:mbox:vol:cz at: 12-Nov-2002 17:22
Hi Joel,
> I really have to regard this as a serious flaw of documentation
> (at least!), and respectfully repeat my passionate request for
> the kind of official, authoritative documentation that would
> allow users to understand what is happening and why!
My POV differs from yours in two points:
a) I think, that the situation is a result of a "hack solution". The
strange
behaviour looks like being unexpected not just by users, but by
implementors too (IMO). This can (at least for me) explain, why it isn't
documented.
b) The behaviour looks like not being designed with these effects in mind
and it needs a second thought. That is why I am not asking for a
documentation change/addendum.
Best regards
-L
