[REBOL] Re: Rolling your own ideal looper: does Repeat still have a bug? Re:(4)
From: g:santilli:tiscalinet:it at: 29-Aug-2000 19:31
On 28-Ago-00, you wrote:
l> 1. Thanks, Gabriele, I forgot to use one more Throw, but the
l> original is needed too.
Yup, that was my mistake, sorry.
l> 3. For uses While anyway, so it is a shortcut.
Indeed. I used FOR just because it was more readable and more
similar to the REPEAT version.
Gabriele Santilli <[giesse--writeme--com]> - Amigan - REBOL programmer
Amiga Group Italia sez. L'Aquila -- http://www.amyresource.it/AGI/