[REBOL] Re: Mutli-threading
From: petr:krenzelok:trz:cz at: 13-Mar-2003 12:03
Gabriele Santilli wrote:
>Hi Petr,
>
>On Thursday, March 13, 2003, 10:31:35 AM, you wrote:
>
>PK> so maybe you have it documented already? ... so you could share it with
>PK> ml? :-)
>
>I don't. But some people have digged into it a bit; also, in 99%
>of cases just /no-wait and using awake functions properly is
>enough.
>
it is a pity imo that there is plenty of code using /no-wait already, so
we are meeting some compatibility issues here. I would prefer having
no-wait behavior as default for ports, and reverse the logic - if you
want synchronous communication, use open/wait .... but I can understand
it would break a lot of code probably ...
cheers,
-pekr-
