[REBOL] Re: Apache vs Xitami: mod_rebol, FastCGI, LWRP
From: petr:krenzelok:trz:cz at: 12-Dec-2001 20:17
Jose Manuel Alvarez wrote:
> Has anybody looked side by side at Apache vs Xitami for very busy sites.
> I understand Xitami main drawback is that it doesn´t support HTTP 1.1
> so I imagine that impacts client performance when retrieving pages
> with lots of graphics. What are Xitami benefits wrt REBOL, if any ?
> The other aspect I am not clear on is which is the best solution for
> REBOL script performace, i.e.
> 1. An Apache native module for REBOL e.g. mod_rebol (not available AFAIK)
> 2. FastCGI on either Apache or Xitami (with Rebol/Command)
I use FastCGI set-up here. Works fine, althoug there are some
limitations if used under Windows, - only ExternalApp directive is
supported. I can't compare its performance though, as I only tested
Apache + FastCGI + Rebol, but several folks here use Xitami + Rebol +
lrwp protocol, which is free and you can find it in library section of