Mailing List Archive: 49091 messages
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search

[REBOL] Re: Apache vs Xitami: mod_rebol, FastCGI, LWRP

From: petr:krenzelok:trz:cz at: 12-Dec-2001 20:17

Jose Manuel Alvarez wrote:
> Hi, > > Has anybody looked side by side at Apache vs Xitami for very busy sites. > > I understand Xitami main drawback is that it doesn´t support HTTP 1.1 > so I imagine that impacts client performance when retrieving pages > with lots of graphics. What are Xitami benefits wrt REBOL, if any ? > > The other aspect I am not clear on is which is the best solution for > REBOL script performace, i.e. > > 1. An Apache native module for REBOL e.g. mod_rebol (not available AFAIK) > 2. FastCGI on either Apache or Xitami (with Rebol/Command)
I use FastCGI set-up here. Works fine, althoug there are some limitations if used under Windows, - only ExternalApp directive is supported. I can't compare its performance though, as I only tested Apache + FastCGI + Rebol, but several folks here use Xitami + Rebol + lrwp protocol, which is free and you can find it in library section of View desktop. -pekr-