[REBOL] Re: Idea for [rebol.org]...
From: robert:muench:robertmuench at: 19-Mar-2004 16:31
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:57:47 -0500, Maxim Olivier-Adlhoch
<[maximo--meteorstudios--com]> wrote:
> so far, it seems to me that rebolers don't play well together
> (code-wise) unless RT is giving its approval.
Hi, that's right.
> Many people seems scared to work on stuff unless RT is somehow in the
> loop, yet MOST of the major breakthroughs in rebol over the last year
> have been by people who have broken that mold.
Yes, we have quite a lot of gurus around here and lately the cooperation
to focus on one goal seems to become better. The async stuff IMO is a good
example.
> Maybe if you volunteer to do some of the work related to setting that
> up, they'll let you host it on their ip?
I'm not sure if I'm the right one, but if there isn't someone else I'm
available to do it. IMO it's mostly a process topic.
> some might also argue that peer-reviewing is what Altme is all about!?
Maybe but it's closed... we need a way that as much people can use and
participate as possible. Until you know about AltME you are an advanced
Rebol community member. I don't see why we should change best-practice
patterns just to use new technology. We need to address the mass.
People joining efforts for one goal can use AltME to coordinate the
development. You know that I'm working on getting xpeers.net running. I
would like to donate accounts for people developing things for the
peer-group.
--
Robert M. M=FCnch
Management & IT Freelancer
Mobile: +49 (177) 245 2802
http://www.robertmuench.de
