[REBOL] Re: problems with url...
From: joel:neely:fedex at: 19-Jun-2002 10:20
On Wednesday, June 19, 2002, at 08:52 AM, Romano Paolo Tenca wrote:
>> LOAD seems to want to unescape the string. That's OK in this case,
>> since all of the escaped characters are actually valid in URLs,
> I think it is not correct, because Load could be unaware of some legal
> rules valid for some existing (and not existing) url.
We're saying the same thing (although sloppily in my case ;-). All I
was that the specific example of escaping allowable characters showed
LOAD was unescaping them, but in an example that didn't immediately blow
I agree that it's problematic for LOAD to unescape the URL prior to use.