Mailing List Archive: 49091 messages
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search

[REBOL] Re: Rugby performace starting to fade

From: petr:krenzelok:trz:cz at: 19-Feb-2002 20:47

Maarten Koopmans wrote:
>Hi Petr, > >I don't want just positive reports, but the thing is that I was pretty sure >that it was not Rugby, and well, I am sort of proud of it, so I kind of.... >well you read it. > >You are right, I was not nice at least, sorry.... >Did you win with ice hockey ? ;-) >
No, we saved our win for the final match ;-)
>I don't get why you have to change things now. >Rugby/http uses (and always has) rebols standard read, so... >
hmm, I will try once again tomorrow. I don't know why is bypass ommited if I have "" specified in my user.r file. However - I got one error with Rugby today, and the port output showed host number of my local IP, but not But I am not 100% sure now, so I will try to test tomorrow once again.
>I don't know what is going on. System administration in your company? >[I know we suffer from that sometimes] >
Yes, I know. I was just suprised that I ran four interpreters from the same directory, using the same config user.r file.
>httpr simply does open/copy/close, so... >
I will try once again tomorrow morning ....
>I don't understand Holger's reply regarding Rugby's architecture. Don't they >advertise with the fact that all scripts run the same on all platforms? >
Well, it was not like that. From what I remember Holger was saying something like there is no difference in TCP layer inside Rebol, so it has to be a) Rugby b) OS. And I think it is definitely OS. W9x has imo delayed ACK, and if Rebol is internally sending only one packet at a time, OS waits a) till the timeout period runs out b) till the second packet arrives .... and only then sends ACK ... But I can be wrong, so don't draw any conclusion yet ... It would be interesting though, if more folks could run proposed Rugby test using W9x systems .... Cheers, -pekr-