[REBOL] Re: annoying public dir
From: moliad:aei:ca at: 14-Aug-2004 13:36
Gregg Irwin wrote:
> Hi Maxim,
>
> MOA> I sometimes wish rebol/view did not include the desktop. And
> MOA> there was a different product, rebol/desktop, which was equal to
> MOA> current /view version.
>
> That would be REBOL/Face (in the SDK). You can build View from it with
> a few includes; no desktop.
yeah, but sdk isn't free and its meant to be encapped. AFAIK, You can't share it unencapped
as an interpreter...
I would love to have a minimal face or view rebol interpreter. If I want to replace
VID, why should I want a version which includes it, for example... yet I don't want my
stuff encapped...
-MAx
