Mailing List Archive: 49091 messages
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search


From: petr:krenzelok:trz:cz at: 17-Dec-2002 11:19

bryan wrote:
> >>Wouldn't it be better for RT to e.g. sell IS framework as special part >>of SDK for some e.g. 500 USD? Maybe even lock it further to special >>licensing scheme? E.g. "if you use any part of IOS SDK, we take 10% of >>sale and 5% of client seat price" ... or something like that ... >> >> > >although I am interested in IOS as something that seems to me to do what >Groove does without the incredible draining of client resources, I don't >know if I would be interested in another Byzantine licensing scheme. > >That's my initial opinion, my second one is that RT could step up as a >serious contender against Groove, which might work to build the >developer base. >
Yes, but that's the problem. RT seems to give up upon positioning IOS against Groove or Lotus Notes. We've seen no improvements of IOS during last year, no new reblets released, etc. If such trend will continue, IOS will die slow death. So I just thought it would be better if some company would take-over development of IOS, or even better, if RT would sell IOS concept in terms of SDK, so developers could build various custom solutions ... licensing scheme above was just an example, it could be completly different ... -pekr-