[REBOL] Re: Debugging [was REBOL/Zine]
From: ryanc:iesco-dms at: 14-Mar-2002 17:20
I beg to differ, my description was not "a little misleading," it was
completely incorrect! Well, not wholy incorrect, but part about the set-word
eventually getting evaluated was absolutely incorrect.
This is a relief to me, because it was starting to bother me when I discovered
that other types were not getting evaluated upon return as I expected, and that
set-word was starting to appear to be some strange exception. I must have
dropped into console about 5 different times today throwing path!'s set-path!'s
function!'s op!'s and whatever I could think of at ??, each time scratching my
head while pondering the mechanics of the black box.
I really appreciate the correction.
Ingo Hohmann wrote: