[REBOL] Re: Ann Rugby 4.3
From: petr:krenzelok:trz:cz at: 22-Nov-2001 14:52
Gabriele Santilli wrote:
> Maarten Koopmans wrote:
>
> > It is *not* a Rugby architecture problem, but merely network management.
>
> That is right, but I can still see an architectural disadvantage
> of Rugby: it being client/server only. I believe fully symmetrical
> peer-to-peer connections can be a great advantage in some cases; I
> think I will try to integrate Rugby in a symmetrical system some
> day...
Not necessarily. Rugby is tine - you can run both client and server in one
app. It just doesn't seem to support permanent connections. It does so using
/deferred, but then you have to check back for the result = polling ....
-pekr-