Mailing List Archive: 49091 messages
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

[REBOL] Re: CASTRO (was: Will this mail arrive?)

From: rebolek:seznam:cz at: 29-May-2002 8:20

I'm really sorry, it's on http://www.sweb.cz/rebolek/castro.r or sites/rebolek/castro and - if you does not have directories %/c/ and %/c/view/ then the script crashes so you have to change the sourcecode. it was written under View 1.2.5 (the new beta) so it may look strange in 1.2.1 ***
> Well, this one appears to have made it. I'm starting to think that
people
> should include a real-time stamp from REBOL just when they send it, > so we can see what delivery patterns are like. Granted, you could
check
> the headers, but sometimes I'm not so sure which time zone they use, > if it's the time from the sender's computer or from his mail server,
etcetc **** It took just hour or less for me to get this mail, it's OK now.
> Any known limits on sizes of pictures and text files (what editor
does it use?),
> or depth of subdirectories, and "funny-names", ie My Documents? > >****
It uses inbuild VIEW editor (just type editor in console or run it from desktop to see it) so it has its limits. The image viewer is just simple view/new layout [image (load %some-image)] - I have to enhance it somehow. The depth of subdirectories is AFAIK unlimited - if REBOL can read the path then it can be shown in castro. Same with funny names - depends only on REBOL.
> Yeah, those are relatively simple tasks. And I understand the, > "It's 1am, so deal with it." ;) I do it too often myself. >
:-)) **
> If I recall previous discussions on here, some suggested that > you create a temp buffer for copying, with a size cap; create >and open the target file, read in the cap amount of data (if there >is at least that much) from the source file, then dump it into the >target file. Once it's been dumped, re-fill the buffer from the source >file, dump again, etcetc, until the remaining data is <= the buffer. > I'm sure this isn't the absolutely most efficient method, though. > I have yet to do it myself, but I haven't really needed to. > The only large files I've really manipulated with REBOL were when > I wrote a static download assistant to download MP3s from a friend's >machine via http and write them to disk locally.
**** Hmm, buffer...I think that the size of the buffer is very system dependent...I'll rather use write/read first (so I'll have some room for improvements and service packs ;-) I'll add FTP for sure and maybe HTTP dir-browser?
> Yeah, that's the beauty of open source. At least, if you're > willing to share your code. If not, then you're screwed ;) Hehehe.
I like open source very much. And it's really must with REBOL 'coz the Very-Well-Known-Lack-Of-Documentation :-) The next version will support browsing thru ZIP and RAR archives (no unpack or pack, sorry) thanks to magical Oldes. bye Bolek