[REBOL] Re: [date date! month month-bounds] MONTH-BOUNDS func design
From: gregg:pointillistic at: 30-Jan-2008 5:56
Hi Anton,
AR> I would prefer not to use
AR> <= 31-Mar-2008/23:59:59
AR> but rather
AR> < 1-Apr-2008
AR> as the first can never be specified with complete accuracy by
AR> definition.
That's true, but then you end up having to write >= for the lower
bound comparison and < for the upper. I like symmetry, and I think I
can live with accuracy as complete as we can get it. Which I guess
means 23:59:59.999.
Given the above, are you saying that "MONTH-BOUNDS Mar-2008" should
return, e.g., [1-Mar-2008 1-Apr-2008]?
-- Gregg
