[REBOL] Re: Puzzle with FIND and SELECT
From: rotenca::telvia::it at: 9-Feb-2003 12:19
> 2) You are free to write your own definition if you like, but I am pretty
> sure, that you will have big problems with the "absolute sameness". The
> reason is simple: my definition is the finest equivalence you can define in
> Rebol, therefore any definition you can write either cannot be finer then
> mine, or it cannot be an equivalence. No sameness that isn't an equivalence
> can be natural, neither I think, that any coarser equivalence is a true
> identity.
I want to say that the finest equivalence is not the finest sameness one can
detect inside the limits of rebol language. The finest sameness happens when
the evaluation process get exactly the same value in the same series.
An equivalence that find the finest sameness should get the unevaluated args
and check that the evaluation process ends to the same value in the same
series.
I do not know if this is "natural".
---
Ciao
Romano
