[REBOL] Re: [testing rugby-core]
From: petr:krenzelok:trz:cz at: 12-Feb-2002 6:21
Thanks a lot, Patrick! Now Maarten - why is there so much of a difference? I would
expect some 3 - 5 % difference for the new version, not 1/3 of the performance
....
pat665 wrote:
> Hi petr
>
> Following your request, I have tested rugby-core versus rugby-xpi. Here are
> the results :
>
> rugby-core (http) -> duration 0:00:59.98
> rugby-xpi (tcp) -> duration 0:00:41.85
> rugby-xpi (http) -> duration 0:00:40.7
>
> It is strange that in rugby-xpi both tcp and http give similar duration.
>
It is not imo :-) http is just tcp with some additional header packed inside :-)
It was one of reasons why Maarten decided to go with http only imho - htpp is more
general and it mean no performance loss. The overall performance is dissappointing
though ...
btw: I don't know what's with my computer, but I can't state following:
do get-rugby-service http://localhost:9005
do get-rugby-service http://127.0.0.1:9005
instead of that I have to state:
do get-rugby-service http://my-real-ip-address-here:9005
strange, shouldn't it work using "localhost" or loopback address?
-pekr-
