[REBOL] Re: How safe is catch 
From: SQLAB:gmx at: 25-Apr-2005 14:20
Try seems to be safe in that case, as I use it in the same application
Throw some-data has probably the same effect, as my second example was
just a shortening.
If I remember right, it was more like throw something to a function call
a few levels higher
Volker Nitsch wrote:
>On 4/25/05, SQLAB <[SQLAB--gmx--net]> wrote:
>>Volker Nitsch wrote:
>>>Just curious: can you throw something? not
>>> if .. [thow]
>throw can take an argument. it can also take no arguments (its
>any-type). but i thought maybe that has an error.
>if it is 'catch, try 'try instead and throw an error.
>if error? try[
> if not important[throw make error! "forget it"]
>'try is more often used, maybe better debugged. thats also the way
>Ladislavs 'throw' works, as far as i see.
>Oh, and of course there is
> forever .. [
> if not important[break]
>if you are not in an inner loop.
I am always in an inner loop and I just want to use throw as Carl
recommended instead of the classic C continue.