[REBOL] Re: RRGib - Random Rebol Gibberish
From: depotcity:telus at: 31-May-2001 21:56
Did I say infinite? I meant to say REALLY REALLY LOTS!
TBrownell
----- Original Message -----
From: "Volker Nitsch" <[agem--crosswinds--net]>
To: <[rebol-list--rebol--com]>
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 3:57 PM
Subject: [REBOL] Re: RRGib - Random Rebol Gibberish
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ursprüngliche Nachricht <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Am 31.05.01, 17:53:26, schrieb "Terry Brownell" <[depotcity--telus--net]>
zum Thema [REBOL] Re: RRGib - Random Rebol Gibberish:
> I think the output would suffer from the second law of thermodynamics
and
> entropy. Although there are millions of potential good programmes
that
> could/would be generated, there are an INFINITE number of useless
ones. This
> is entropy.
> What you need is a programme that can decide what is good, and what is
> infinite.
That means there are an infinite number of good programms?
Any percentage of infinite is by itself infinite, regardless of how
small.
Infinite * 1e-10000000 are again infinite..
hey, lots of programms! (pst! tell its all by you ;-)
> T Brownell
-Volker