[REBOL] Re: RRGib - Random Rebol Gibberish
From: depotcity:telus at: 31-May-2001 21:56
Did I say infinite? I meant to say REALLY REALLY LOTS!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Volker Nitsch" <[agem--crosswinds--net]>
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 3:57 PM
Subject: [REBOL] Re: RRGib - Random Rebol Gibberish
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ursprüngliche Nachricht <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Am 31.05.01, 17:53:26, schrieb "Terry Brownell" <[depotcity--telus--net]>
zum Thema [REBOL] Re: RRGib - Random Rebol Gibberish:
> I think the output would suffer from the second law of thermodynamics
> entropy. Although there are millions of potential good programmes
> could/would be generated, there are an INFINITE number of useless
> is entropy.
> What you need is a programme that can decide what is good, and what is
That means there are an infinite number of good programms?
Any percentage of infinite is by itself infinite, regardless of how
Infinite * 1e-10000000 are again infinite..
hey, lots of programms! (pst! tell its all by you ;-)
> T Brownell