[REBOL] Re: REBOL/Command vs Doc's MySQL scheme
From: tim:johnsons-web at: 31-Mar-2003 10:46
* Mat Bettinson <[mat--plothatching--com]> [030331 10:02]:
> Hello Gregg,
>
> GI> Glad to hear there was an easy solution. I think Pekr has said before
> GI> that Doc's is a much better way to go and that RT should ship his
> GI> instead. :)
Hello All:
---------
Operative word 'ship:
I can only speak for the components that I have used and
that is Andrew's ML dialect and Doc's MysqlProtocol.
(my apologies to others whose components I have not used)
Yes, perhaps RT should consider 'shipping' user built
components that are industrial strength.
I am voting for Mysql Protocol and the ML dialect. This
is from my own experience...
MTCW: tim
> Indeed, I mean my application really was nothing requiring speed but
> 117 times slower meant it was holding even that back!
>
> Still, I'm very happy now. In a few days I've gone from not knowing
> anything about SQL and having never written a proper database
> application to having one up and running that I'm very pleased with.
>
> I had to write some other things for this while I was at it, including
> a proper dual plain/HTML mail sender with in-lined embedded image
> attachments (yes yes I know but the client likes this stuff). That
> might actually be quite a good one to supercede the one that's in the
> library at the moment.
>
> Regards,
>
> Mat Bettinson - +44-(0)20-83401514.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
> [rebol-request--rebol--com] with "unsubscribe" in the
> subject, without the quotes.
--
Tim Johnson <[tim--johnsons-web--com]>
http://www.alaska-internet-solutions.com
http://www.johnsons-web.com
