[REBOL] Re: Article on future languages
From: alanwall:sonic at: 12-Apr-2003 14:38
Hello Rod
On 11-Apr-03, Rod Gaither wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Just thought I'd pass along an interesting
> opinion piece on future computer languages.
>
> Pulled from slashdot earlier today.
>
> http://www.paulgraham.com/hundred.html
>
And this is Pauls reply to my ? about his view of Rebol:
X-From_: [pg--archub--org] Sat Apr 12 07:52:41 2003
Return-Path: [pg--archub--org]
Date: 12 Apr 2003 14:52:25 -0000
Cerebrus: http://www.compkarori.com/cerebrus/index.html
Cerebrus-version: 1.4.30
Cerebrus-reason: Allowed sender p: 0
To: [alanwall--sonic--net]
From: Paul Graham <[pg--archub--org]>
Subject: Re: hundred.html
It reminds me of Lisp too, but I'd miss macros.
--pg
--Alan Crandall wrote:
> What are your views of Rebol? http://www.rebol.com
> Many ppl have said it reminds them of Lisp/uses oo /can read xml/is x-net
ready.
Regards
--
The philosophers of the Middle Ages demonstrated both that the Earth did
not exist and also that it was flat. Today they are still arguing about
whether the world exists, but they no longer dispute about whether it is
flat.
-- Vilhjalmur Stefansson
sent via Yam ver2.31 on AmigaForever verV
Be a Rebel get Rebol@ rebol.com
UIN#=9391028
