[REBOL] Re: Rugby RIP
From: nitsch-lists:netcologne at: 17-Jan-2002 22:32
RE: [REBOL] Re: Rugby RIP
[carl--cybercraft--co--nz] wrote:
> On 18-Jan-02, Petr Krenzelok wrote:
>
> > Maarten Koopmans wrote:
>
> >> All,
>
> >> Rugby is officially dead, the web sites have been removed. You may
> >> use it (including republishing) as the BSD license indicates if you
> >> stil have it.
>
> >> With IOS coming Rebol will have a built-in distributed system. If
> >> IOS fails there is no case for such thing anyway. I feel it is in
> >> Rebols best interest if there 'is only one'.
>
> >> Thank you all for using it and making it a fun.
>
> >> Goodbye,
>
> >> Maarten
>
>
> I had a vague feeling I'd seen Rugby mentioned on the REBOL site, but
> I can't find the reference there any more. I did notice that Core,
> Command and View are now refered to as "REBOL Messaging Language
> Products". How long has that been the case?
>
was mentioned by Carl Sassenrath in the os-news interview?
http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=199
::
In REBOL, applications are agile. You don't need SOAP, WSDL, SCL, NASSL, UDDI, UML, MSXML,
XSLT, RMI, IIOP, DCOM, DNA, or anything else. You write it, and it works - just about
everywhere. If you need object brokering such as Corba, you can use a broker such as
Rugby. Rugby is advanced, robust, fast, and it is written in only 1500 lines of REBOL.
;;;
Maarten, what happend?
