[REBOL] Re: DyBASE test
From: g:santilli:tiscalinet:it at: 24-Dec-2003 12:52
On Wednesday, December 24, 2003, 12:25:55 PM, you wrote:
KK> The bug is that word "func" is missed, so instead of method definition
KK> this code is treated by Rebol as initialization of "close" field with
KK> block ["close database"]. What compiler does with second block is not
KK> clear to me, I think it was just skipped.
There's no compiler, and there's no construct... that's why
there's no error too.
KK> That is why I said that language should be less error prone.
There's no way it could, in this specific case. Setting a word to
a block is perfectly legitimate...
Gabriele Santilli <[g--santilli--tiscalinet--it]> -- REBOL Programmer
Amiga Group Italia sez. L'Aquila --- SOON: http://www.rebol.it/