[REBOL] Re: COM Supporting in rebol.
From: benjamin_maggi::hotmail::com at: 25-Oct-2005 20:09
Callbacks are supported by rebol of course to use it in library calls you
need to have /pro /command.
Im know this will break the cross plataform independence, this is why im
researching on XPCOM technology because i found it to be better and open
source !. still not massively used we all know greko lib for mozilla... so i
think RT have to take a look to this new concepts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Ed O'Connor <edoconnor-gmail.com>
Reply-To: rebolist-rebol.com
To: rebolist-rebol.com
Subject: [REBOL] Re: COM Supporting in rebol.
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:42:56 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from mail.rebol.net ([209.167.34.210]) by MC6-F38.hotmail.com
withMicrosoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Tue, 25 Oct 2005 08:43:13 -0700
Received: from mail.rebol.net (mail.rebol.net [209.167.34.210])by
mail.rebol.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFF9E426E;Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:42:59
-0400 (EDT)
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list rebol); Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:42:59
-0400(EDT)
Received: from gs5.inmotionhosting.com (www.rebol.com [216.193.197.238])by
mail.rebol.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 790FC420Efor <rebolist-rebol.net>;
Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:42:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [66.249.82.196] (port=14255 helo=xproxy.gmail.com)by
gs5.inmotionhosting.com with esmtp (Exim 4.52)id 1EUQx3-0000Lg-7rfor
rebolist-rebol.com; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 08:43:01 -0700
Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s19so239360wxc for
<rebolist-rebol.com>; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 08:42:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.70.29.4 with SMTP id c4mr4287357wxc; Tue, 25 Oct 2005
08:42:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.70.110.16 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 08:42:56 -0700 (PDT)
>I like the concept, but unfortunately I haven't been able to run the
>sample code in a version of Command/View. Not sure if it's a version
>problem or something else. (error says " Invalid argument: callback!")
>
>Reminds me of some of the capabilities that Ruby supports natively.
>See article referenced at:
>http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/61035
>
>Although it runs counter to the platform-independence dogma, it would
>be interesting if Carl reviewed and gave an opinion on his blog. As it
>currently stands, I imagine that developers requiring any kind of
>Windows integration or widgetry steer far clear of REBOL (with similar
>issues on OS X).
>
>Ed
>
>On 10/22/05, Benjamin Maggi wrote:
>>
>>I've been working in a project to add supporting for COM objects in REBOL
>,
>>it requires /pro /command to work because it uses a DLL to perform
>>calls.
>>The idea of this project is to provide REBOL's the ability to "talk" to C
>OM
>>objects not just a few one's but to all
>>kind of COM object ...
>>the examples show using Office automation, Windows Management
>>Instrumentation(WMI) and Internet explorer. but you can use COMLib
>>to perform other COM automation tasks, like Speech API, wizard and more,
>If
>>you have to do COM interfacing try this one !
>>
>>The project still remains an alpha testing stage. im working on !
>>Feedbacks are welcome.
>>You can also find a discussion board on AltMe REBOL3, search for "COM
>>supporting" group
>>
>>Benjamin.
>--
>To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to
>lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nuevo MSN Messenger Una forma rápida y divertida de enviar mensajes[1]
--- Links ---
1 http://g.msn.com/8HMBESAR/2743??PS=47575
