[REBOL] Why I'll pay for REBOL/command (or not). Was - Will REBOL/View be comme
From: tsummerfelt1:home at: 23-Sep-2000 9:24
On Sat, 23 Sep 2000 16:33:03 +0200
[petr--krenzelok--trz--cz] wrote:
> I need REBOL/Command and REBOL/View to work together. We've changed
as an intermediate solution, you could always throw a tcl/tk front end
around your rebol/command programs...of course you may find tcl/tk so
easy to work with (and complete) that you end up switching to it
completly :)
> > 1. I NEED A CLEAR ROADMAP.
coincidentally, there is a tcl/tk roadmap (for the 'free' and 'commercial'
aspects of the language)
[all the rest of your points are easily covered by tcl/tk]
the only real reason i added rebol to my language toolbox was the easy
of net related programming.
at the moment it's much easier to throw a tk front end to rebol programs
than it is writing rebol/view...
i would think that i'm not alone in saying that most programmers can't
be tied down to one language. rebol offers quite a bit to programmers,
but i don't find it the end-all solution to every programming problem.
at this point i wouldn't want to maintain a rebol program much more than
50 lines long. it's taking me longer to wrap my mind around rebol than
it did python. and unfortunately i keep bumping into brick walls that
have no answers in the docs...
.t
*--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| http://members.home.net/tsummerfelt1
|
*--------------------------------------------------