[REBOL] Re: More benchmarks...
From: petr:krenzelok:trz:cz at: 19-Feb-2002 14:33
Well, look at my a little bit longer message. There are now two areas of
- bad W95, W98SE performance .... but, maybe (and I think so) it has something to
do with Windoze, than with Rebol or Rugby themselves ...
- the need to add actual IP address to bypass block, if you use proxy. Adding
loopback address there doesn't help. Maybe only some small change in the code is
needed to correct that? Or is that the way it is supposed to be?
Maarten Koopmans wrote:
> Hi All,
> After Petr's complaints I did some more benchmarks on my 1 Ghz Linux machine,
> doing his tests.
> loop 1000 [echo "la"] in Rugby.
> No compression:
> 305 reqs/sec
hmm, 1.4 athlon, W2K, some 200 req/sec ... Linux seems to be faster in that
regard, unless there are other factors which influence the test. However, both
results are VERY nice.