Diversion
[1/18] from: tbrownell::shaw::ca at: 4-Mar-2002 0:02
I've noticed that the weekend postings to this board seem to drop by at least 90%. Is
that a sign that Rebol is a workplace diversion?
TB
[2/18] from: robbo1mark:aol at: 4-Mar-2002 7:27
Hello,
I'd say it's more indicative that people actually have real lives away from computers
and why waste precious free time at the weekend writing and talking about ANY computer
language when there's a million more exciting things to be doing.
If you can't think of more exciting things than REBOl at weekends then you should get
outside more.
That said i don't always heed my own advice - I often think about computer related subjects
whilst dog walking at weekends ;-)
cheers,
Mark Dickson
In a message dated Mon, 4 Mar 2002 7:05:10 AM Eastern Standard Time, Terry Brownell
<[tbrownell--shaw--ca]> writes:
[3/18] from: rebol665:ifrance at: 4-Mar-2002 13:51
Hi
At last, I am not alone in my loneliness !
Even Ladislav's Website seems to be down (http://www.sweb.cz/LMecir/). By
the way, I would like to know more about bind and use. If anyone has
examples, explanations, even raw material ?
Joel, Ladislav, Gregg, Carl, Romano, Gabrielle, Andrew, Brett, Alan,
Maarten, Petr, Allen, Robert, Sunanda, Jason ?
Patrick
[4/18] from: rotenca:telvia:it at: 4-Mar-2002 17:07
Hi Pat,
I'm here. About binding, ask and i'll try to answer, for what I know.
I've found Ladislav's site always down in the last weeks.
Ladislav: you should find another web server: at least for HTML pages there
are plenty of fast free services.
---
Ciao
Romano
[5/18] from: lmecir:mbox:vol:cz at: 4-Mar-2002 16:37
Hi Pat,
strange, it is accessible for me, don't know what's up?
Cheers
Ladislav
<<Pat>>
Hi
At last, I am not alone in my loneliness !
Even Ladislav's Website seems to be down (http://www.sweb.cz/LMecir/). By
the way, I would like to know more about bind and use. If anyone has
examples, explanations, even raw material ?
Joel, Ladislav, Gregg, Carl, Romano, Gabrielle, Andrew, Brett, Alan,
Maarten, Petr, Allen, Robert, Sunanda, Jason ?
Patrick
[6/18] from: rebol665:ifrance at: 4-Mar-2002 17:52
Hi Ladislav,
It is still invisible to me. I will try again at home . However it would be
cool to have your work available at RebolForce, wouldn't it ?
Patrick
[7/18] from: rebol665:ifrance at: 4-Mar-2002 18:00
Thanks Romano
I will certainly ask for help about binding. I have avoided the subject for
a while because I found it too difficult. I was hoping that I was ready now.
Unfortunately, as I was re reading some Ladislav stuff this weekend, I
discovered some code I do not quite understand.
Patrick
[8/18] from: sunandadh:aol at: 4-Mar-2002 11:58
> http://www.sweb.cz/LMecir/
I've never had any trouble getting to Ladislav's site. Are some people still
behind Cold War firewalls!?
Sunanda.
[9/18] from: chris:starforge at: 4-Mar-2002 19:06
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
#Monday 04 March 2002 15:37# Message from Ladislav Mecir:
> (http://www.sweb.cz/LMecir/)
FWIW, it works fine here too.
Chris
- --
.------{ http://www.starforge.co.uk }-----. .---------------------------.
=[ Explorer2260, Designer and Coder \=\ P: TexMaker, Draktar \
=[_[ You will obey the corporate masters. ]_]==[ Stack: EEOeOeOeTmTmDD---- ]
- --
Things I'd Do If I Ever Became An Evil Overlord
54. I will not strike a bargain with a demonic being then attempt to
double-cross it simply because I feel like being contrary.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE8g8XCtwxr0HXns0wRAnOfAKDrT4S/3/Onn9xdcQUh8v1NSI8HrwCfcwBI
aU/hxABzYEPz8AohQ/ihEpU=T7Pn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[10/18] from: rgaither:triad:rr at: 4-Mar-2002 15:23
>#Monday 04 March 2002 15:37# Message from Ladislav Mecir:
>> (http://www.sweb.cz/LMecir/)
>
>FWIW, it works fine here too.
Doesn't work for me currently.
FWIW, Rod.
Rod Gaither
Oak Ridge, NC - USA
[rgaither--triad--rr--com]
[11/18] from: carl:cybercraft at: 5-Mar-2002 10:25
On 05-Mar-02, [Robbo1Mark--aol--com] wrote:
> Hello,
> I'd say it's more indicative that people actually have real lives
> away from computers and why waste precious free time at the weekend
> writing and talking about ANY computer language when there's a
> million more exciting things to be doing.
Or, alternatively, why work when you could be talking about computer
languages in your employer's time, eh? (;
--
Carl Read
[12/18] from: tomc:darkwing:uoregon at: 4-Mar-2002 13:25
hmmm
>> read http://www.sweb.cz/LMecir/
connecting to: www.sweb.cz
** Access Error: Cannot connect to www.sweb.cz
** Where: open-proto
** Near: read http://www.sweb.cz/LMecir/
>>
I cannot get there via browser either
On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, Ladislav Mecir wrote:
[13/18] from: gschwarz:netconnect:au at: 5-Mar-2002 9:18
On Mon, 04 Mar 2002 07:27:42 EST
[Robbo1Mark--aol--com] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd say it's more indicative that people actually have real lives away from computers
and why waste precious free time at the weekend writing and talking about ANY computer
language when there's a million more exciting things to be doing.
>
> If you can't think of more exciting things than REBOl at weekends then you should get
outside more.
>
> That said i don't always heed my own advice - I often think about computer related
subjects whilst dog walking at weekends ;-)
>
> cheers,
>
> Mark Dickson
>
Computers for most people are a work tool, some use it for a hobby (no money in hobbies).
That would be one reason for less posts on a weekend.
In my case wife would kill me if I spent the weekend looking at a computer screen. :-)
Regards,
Greg
[14/18] from: joel:neely:fedex at: 4-Mar-2002 23:36
Hi, Patrick,
pat665 wrote:
> ... I would like to know more about bind and use. If anyone has
> examples, explanations, even raw material ?
>
Here's a starter, with mild apologies for the length:
http://www.escribe.com/internet/rebol/m19482.html
This was from a previous discussion, but note the parts about each
REBOL word belonging to a context and FUNC changing contexts of
words. You can have words with the same "name", but which are
different words because they belong to different contexts. (Think
of the fact that "George" is a different person, depending on
whether you're in the Clooney house, the White House, or the
Jungle.)
Now consider this transcript:
>> fee: "phi" == "phi"
>> fie: "phei" == "phei"
>> foe: "pho" == "pho"
>> fum: [fee fie foe] == [fee fie foe]
>> print fum -> phi phei pho
FUM contains three words, which belong to the global context.
>> some-object: make object! [
[ fee: $25.00
[ fie: "shame"
[ foe: "opponent"
[ tunnel: func [b [block!]] [bind b 'self]
[ ]
SOME-OBJECT also has three words with those same names, but they
are in a different context, so...
>> print fum
phi phei pho
...FUM still refers to the original (global) three words.
Now let's tunnel into the context of SOME-OBJECT...
>> some-object/tunnel fum == [fee fie foe]
FUM still refers to three words with the same names, but now
they live in a different house...
>> print fum -> $25.00 shame opponent
but
>> print [fee fie foe] -> phi phei pho
So that
bind foo 'baz
(where FOO is a block of words) says "for each word reference
in FOO, if there is a synonym for that word in the context
that contains 'BAZ, make that reference in FOO be to the synonym
in 'BAZ 's context."
HTH!
-jn-
--
; sub REBOL {}; sub head ($) {@_[0]}
REBOL []
# despam: func [e] [replace replace/all e ":" "." "#" "@"]
; sub despam {my ($e) = @_; $e =~ tr/:#/.@/; return "\n$e"}
print head reverse despam "moc:xedef#yleen:leoj" ;
[15/18] from: lmecir:mbox:vol:cz at: 5-Mar-2002 8:32
Thanks, Chris
I really do not know why some cannot open my site, maybe I should consider
the option to mirror it at Rebol Forces. (Allen, how about that idea?)
Ladislav
From: "Chris"
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 8:06 PM
Subject: [REBOL] Re: Diversion
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
#Monday 04 March 2002 15:37# Message from Ladislav Mecir:
> (http://www.sweb.cz/LMecir/)
FWIW, it works fine here too.
Chris
[16/18] from: lmecir:mbox:vol:cz at: 5-Mar-2002 8:34
Hi Pat,
feel free to ask, it may help me to improve the wording
TIA
L
From: "pat665"
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 6:00 PM
Subject: [REBOL] Re: Diversion
Thanks Romano
I will certainly ask for help about binding. I have avoided the subject for
a while because I found it too difficult. I was hoping that I was ready now.
Unfortunately, as I was re reading some Ladislav stuff this weekend, I
discovered some code I do not quite understand.
Patrick
[17/18] from: chalz:earthlink at: 6-Mar-2002 0:27
Heh. I like your interpretation of it. I'm usually not home at all on
weekends, so I'm kind of thankful for the drop-off - as it is I get too much
mail ;)
--Charles
> Hello,
>
> I'd say it's more indicative that people actually have real lives away from
computers and why waste precious free time at the weekend writing and talking
about ANY computer language when there's a million more exciting things to be
doing.
[18/18] from: tbrownell:shaw:ca at: 6-Mar-2002 9:25
Charles wrote...
> If you can't think of more exciting things than REBOl at weekends then
you
> should get outside more.
>
> That said i don't always heed my own advice - I often think about
computer
> related subjects whilst dog walking at weekends ;-)
It's all relative. Some actually find 'dog walking' exciting, and others,
like my ex Hong Kongian (?) landlords, dog eating.
Frankly I find it all a bit vain.
TB