Mailing List Archive: 49091 messages
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

read URL => error, exists? URL => false (SAMPLE CODE ATTACHED)

 [1/2] from: princepawn::lycos::com at: 11-Sep-2000 13:31


>> read ftp://1.1.1.1
connecting to: 1.1.1.1 ** User Error: Failed login to 1.1.1.1 as anonymous. Check your login. ** Where: read ftp://1.1.1.1
>> exists? ftp://1.1.1.1
connecting to: 1.1.1.1 == false
>>
is this a valid set of responses? Or, because there was a read error in both cases, should an error always be thrown? I have a piece of code which behaves in certain ways based on errors and other ways based on failures and unfortunately the behavior for a failure is being triggered when the behavior for error should occur in both cases. wait-duration: 0:5:00 host-cycle: func [ _until-b [block!] "we wait for this to happen" _then-b [block!] "when until-b true, we do this" /local until-b then-b connect-attempts error-count status quitting-time new-until-b ftp-host ] [ print reform [ "here is until-b:" _until-b newline newline "and here is then-b:" _then-b ] quitting-time: now/time + wait-duration error-count: 0 until [ forall ftp-hosts [ ftp-host: first ftp-hosts until-b: replace (copy _until-b) 'ftp-host ftp-host then-b: replace (copy _then-b) 'ftp-host ftp-host print reform [ "trying ftp host:" ftp-host newline "doing" until-b ] either error? status: try until-b [ print reform "error attempting" until-b ][ either not status [ error-count: error-count + 1 print reform [ until-b "unsuccessful" ] wait 15 ] [ print reform [ until-b "successful... executing" then-b ] do then-b break ] ] ] ftp-hosts: head ftp-hosts any [ (now/time > quitting-time) (error-count > max-connect-retries) status ] ] ] until-b: compose [ _url: form-url (ftp-username) (ftp-password) ftp-host (ftp-dir) print reform [ "url is" _url ] _upfile-url: to-url rejoin [ _url (upfile-name) ] print reform [ "checking existence of" _upfile-url ] exists? _upfile-url ] then-b: compose [ upload-file (ftp-username) (ftp-password) ftp-host (pgp-outfile) (pgp-outfile) (ftp-dir) upload-file (ftp-username) (ftp-password) ftp-host (upfile-name) (upfile-name) (ftp-dir) ] host-cycle until-b then-b ;;; call host-cycle

 [2/2] from: princepawn::lycos::com at: 11-Sep-2000 13:29

read URL => error, exists? URL => false


>> read ftp://1.1.1.1
connecting to: 1.1.1.1 ** User Error: Failed login to 1.1.1.1 as anonymous. Check your login. ** Where: read ftp://1.1.1.1
>> exists? ftp://1.1.1.1
connecting to: 1.1.1.1 == false
>>
is this a valid set of responses? Or, because there was a read error in both cases, should an error always be thrown? I have a piece of code which behaves in certain ways based on errors and other ways based on failures and unfortunately the behavior for a failure is being triggered when the behavior for error should occur in both cases.