[view]
[1/3] from: maximo::meteorstudios::com at: 7-Jan-2004 14:43
an advanced/obscure question!
Does anyone know if manually setting the parent-face attributer of a face object is cause
for concern?
In my current algorythm, some faces are generated manually and are linked by parsing
data. But some of them need to create face in panes and these need to use the parent-face
values in order to build-up some draw effects BEFORE the faces are shown... (lines in
between faces added to backdrop).
So far I have seen no problems, but I just wanted to be sure...
THANKS for any tips
-MAx
---
You can either be part of the problem or part of the solution, but in the end, being
part of the problem is much more fun.
[2/3] from: nitsch-lists:netcologne at: 8-Jan-2004 7:34
Am Mittwoch 07 Januar 2004 20:43 schrieb Maxim Olivier-Adlhoch:
> an advanced/obscure question!
> Does anyone know if manually setting the parent-face attributer of a face
<<quoted lines omitted: 3>>
> need to use the parent-face values in order to build-up some draw effects
> BEFORE the faces are shown... (lines in between faces added to backdrop).
should not make problems. because 'panel does it too:
and 'layout does not reset it. i guess 'show overvrites it when building tree.
(btw trick in panel: if you set /parent-face in init, this is the really used
face. so a style can replace itself with another face while layouting).
!>> probe get in get-style 'panel 'facets
[with [feel: none append init [parent-face: layout/parent/size/styles second
:action self size copy self/styles]]]
> So far I have seen no problems, but I just wanted to be sure...
>
> THANKS for any tips
>
> -MAx
> ---
> "You can either be part of the problem or part of the solution, but in the
> end, being part of the problem is much more fun."
-Volker
[3/3] from: moliad:aei:ca at: 8-Jan-2004 14:45
thanks for the info!
Notes
- Quoted lines have been omitted from some messages.
View the message alone to see the lines that have been omitted