[ANN] Async call:// protocol v1.0
[1/7] from: dockimbel::free::fr at: 18-Feb-2004 1:04
Hi all,
This is a replacement version of the 'call command for Windows-only
platforms. This is an asynchronous 'call implementation working as a
REBOL port (call://). It requires the /Library component. See the
documentation included for a complete description.
Download URL: http://rebol.softinnov.org/dl/async-call-r100.zip
This archive contains :
- The call:// protocol script
- A commented version of this script
- The complete documentation in HTML format
- The "Multiple Ping" demo script
Hope that you'll find it useful.
-DocKimbel
PS: Who said I'm not able to make 1.0 versions ? ;-)
[2/7] from: amicom:sonic at: 17-Feb-2004 19:59
DocKimbel,
Yet another outstanding offering!
You made my evening!
Bohdan "Bo" Lechnowsky
Lechnowsky Technical Consulting
At 01:04 AM 2/18/04 +0100, you wrote:
[3/7] from: brett:codeconscious at: 18-Feb-2004 16:57
Nice piece of work! Functional and something to learn from. Great little
demo too.
Thanks for posting it!
Regards,
Brett.
[4/7] from: maarten:vrijheid at: 18-Feb-2004 7:40
Hi Doc,
I knew you had this, but wrapping it as a protocol is so elegant!
--Maarten
Nenad Rakocevic wrote:
[5/7] from: cyphre:seznam:cz at: 18-Feb-2004 8:27
Great work Nenad!
regards
Cyphre
[6/7] from: rotenca:telvia:it at: 18-Feb-2004 13:35
I should like to know people opinions about async interface for user callback
functions.
Until now we have 2 different strategies:
1) async:// which uses port/awake with an argument to switch among states
2) call:// which uses port/locals/custom-name1: func [][]
port/locals/custom-name2: func [][]
Rebol has not a standard method for handling async port call-back, so can be
useful to reach an agreement about a pseudo-standard.
What do you think?
---
Ciao
Romano
[7/7] from: reboler:bol at: 18-Feb-2004 16:34
Congratulations!! Dockimbel!!
Very good!!
Thanks for sharing.
Best Regards,
--DJ