[ALLY] Re: View 0.10.38 under Win2K already expired?

[1/3] from: bo:rebol at: 3-Nov-2000 10:55

martin, Some browsers will actually give you a download out of the cache if it knows you've downloaded a particular file before (or at least this is what I understand can happen). Also, check the date on your system (including the year). This has been known to cause problems before. :-) -Bo On 3-Nov-2000/13:11:40-5:00, [martin--middleton--speechworks--com] wrote:

>I downloaded the latest experimental release of View (dated 10/31/00), but >when I try to run it, it says it's expired and I need a newer version. Core

<<quoted lines omitted: 4>>

>[ally-request--rebol--com] with "unsubscribe" in the >subject, without the quotes.

-- Bohdan "Bo" Lechnowsky REBOL Adventure Guide REBOL Technologies 707-467-8000 (http://www.rebol.com) The Official Source for REBOL Books (http://www.REBOLpress.com)

[2/3] from: martin::middleton::speechworks::com at: 3-Nov-2000 13:11

I downloaded the latest experimental release of View (dated 10/31/00), but when I try to run it, it says it's expired and I need a newer version. Core is fine though. - martin

[3/3] from: al:bri:xtra at: 4-Nov-2000 8:32

Bo wrote:

> Also, check the date on your system (including the year). This has been

known to cause problems before. :-) Ditto on this point. I've come across a number of Windows computers last year that have had their date set to 2099! My previous computer changed the year twice on me! I believe this can be caused by older PC BIOS code, but it hasn't happened regularly enough for me to be able to investigate further. Andrew Martin ICQ: 26227169 http://members.nbci.com/AndrewMartin/

Notes

Quoted lines have been omitted from some messages.
View the message alone to see the lines that have been omitted