[ALLY] REBOL/Express has RSA Encryption
[1/7] from: carl:pacific at: 1-Oct-2000 10:03
RSA encryption is now running in REBOL/Express. We don't support HTTPS, because its
code alone is twice the size of REBOL. HTTPS would make REBOL/View 1 MB. That's too
much for too little. Our RSA encryption adds 30KB to REBOL. RSA is standard, fast,
and very secure.
-Carl
At 10/1/00 03:34 PM +0000, you wrote:
[2/7] from: carl:pacific at: 1-Oct-2000 16:46
Yes, as it currently exists REBOL/Express provides a server module that plugs into CGI
or Apache, so you can use your existing servers. The installation is minimal, as is standard
with REBOL.
-Carl
At 10/1/00 06:31 PM +0000, you wrote:
[3/7] from: mike_riley_:ho:tmail at: 1-Oct-2000 18:31
In that case, I would assume that a REBOL-based server process would have to
run on the server, instead of Apache, IIS or others. Is that a correct
assumption?
- Mike
>From: [carl--pacific--net]
>Reply-To: [ally--rebol--com]
<<quoted lines omitted: 53>>
> >http://profiles.msn.com.
> >
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.
[4/7] from: ptretter:charter at: 2-Oct-2000 9:15
Problem is people have become use to looking for that padlock in their
browser. Would be nice to see https module that can be downloaded in
addition. That way we have an option to use it.
Paul Tretter
[5/7] from: ptretter:charter at: 2-Oct-2000 9:15
And the price for REBOL/express?
Paul Tretter
[6/7] from: doug:vos:eds at: 2-Oct-2000 13:01
We also are using rebol CGI and accessing via https://
in the browser. Works good.
As I stated in a message last week, this works fine (no problems)
and the only limitation being that you cannot use REBOL functions
read https:// or load/markup https://.
[7/7] from: news:ted:husted at: 27-Nov-2000 12:02
On 10/2/2000 at 9:15 AM [ptretter--charter--net] wrote:
> Problem is people have become use to looking for that padlock in
their browser. Would be nice to see https module that can be
downloaded in addition. That way we have an option to use it.
I think the big picture with /EXPRESS is that people would be usually
running through /VIEW application rather than a browser. So you snap
your own padlock!
For browser applications, I submit transactions to /CORE CGI's via
HTTPS without any apparent problems. /CORE might not support HTTPS, but
the browser calling it does.
-T.
Notes
- Quoted lines have been omitted from some messages.
View the message alone to see the lines that have been omitted