Mailing list home
  Find posts   Help

Latest messageRecent messages

Other threads:
 Prev: REBOL 3.0 Roadmap
 Next: Good Link

 Random thread

Indexes:
 By topic
 By date
 By author
 By subject
Join the Mailing List....
AccessibilityAbout / FAQ
Member's loungeContact/FeedbackOther REBOL links
Membership:
member name

password

Remember?

Not a member? Please join
2-May 2:38 UTC
[0.07] 10.876k
Mailing List Archive: 49091 messages
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

REBOL 3.0 Roadmap/MySQL?

 [1/6] from: tim-johnsons:web at: 26-Mar-2006 8:39


* Gabriele Santilli <gabriele-colellachiara.com> [060325 11:01]:
> Hello all, > > http://www.rebol.com/notes/rebol3roadmap.html
Read it. Curious about the references to MySQL support. Don't we have it already? (mysql-protocol). If you want to keep rebol small, why add that which works so well already? For that matter, if one wants to keep rebol lightweight and nimble, why not sqlite support? And furthermore, what does "MySQL support" mean? Does it mean that SO/DLL connection is compiled-in? Or that the port connection is compiled-in? Please don't hard-code port-ID 3306 :-) tim -- Tim Johnson <tim-johnsons-web.com> http://www.alaska-internet-solutions.com

 [2/6] from: hallvard:ystad:gmai:l at: 26-Mar-2006 19:45


On 26/03/06, Tim Johnson <tim-johnsons-web.com> wrote:
> And furthermore, what does "MySQL support" mean? > Does it mean that SO/DLL connection is compiled-in? > Or that the port connection is compiled-in? > > Please don't hard-code port-ID 3306 :-)
Socket access would be great. On the other hand, I do agree: if rebol is to be lightweight, keep MySQL out of it. We've got DocKimbel's solution already, and why MySQL instead of others? HY

 [3/6] from: robert_brandner:gmx:at at: 26-Mar-2006 20:11


> Read it. Curious about the references to MySQL support. > Don't we have it already? (mysql-protocol). If you > want to keep rebol small, why add that which works so > well already?
I think this was just an example, referring to the port stuff.
> For that matter, if one wants to keep rebol lightweight and > nimble, why not sqlite support?
I guess, the mentioned "Resident Storage Method" goes in that direction. regards, robert

 [4/6] from: greggirwin::mindspring::com at: 26-Mar-2006 12:33


>> Read it. Curious about the references to MySQL support. >> Don't we have it already? (mysql-protocol). If you >> want to keep rebol small, why add that which works so >> well already?
RB> I think this was just an example, referring to the port stuff. Yes, my take on it is that they want to make it easier to integrate things from the outside.
>> >> For that matter, if one wants to keep rebol lightweight and >> nimble, why not sqlite support?
RB> I guess, the mentioned "Resident Storage Method" goes in that RB> direction. That probably refers to the old RIF initiative. -- Gregg

 [5/6] from: tim-johnsons::web::com at: 26-Mar-2006 11:23


* Gregg Irwin <greggirwin-mindspring.com> [060326 10:49]:
> Yes, my take on it is that they want to make it easier to integrate > things from the outside.
Yes! "That's the ticket". Tim -- Tim Johnson <tim-johnsons-web.com> http://www.alaska-internet-solutions.com

 [6/6] from: gabriele::colellachiara::com at: 27-Mar-2006 13:40


Hi Tim, On Sunday, March 26, 2006, 7:39:59 PM, you wrote: TJ> And furthermore, what does "MySQL support" mean? TJ> Does it mean that SO/DLL connection is compiled-in? TJ> Or that the port connection is compiled-in? /Command has native MySQL support. Carl is referring to that. Regards, Gabriele. -- Gabriele Santilli <gabriele-rebol.com> --- http://www.rebol.com/ Colella Chiara software division --- http://www.colellachiara.com/