Call for open-source project? Solution: Launch Programs from REBOL/View
[1/3] from: petr::krenzelok::trz::cz at: 28-Sep-2000 11:42
----- Original Message -----
From: <[dado--slovkaufring--sk]>
To: <[list--rebol--com]>
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 9:52 AM
Subject: [REBOL] Solution: Launch Programs from REBOL/View Re:
> > Well imagine following:
> >
<<quoted lines omitted: 27>>
> there would be no "listen". You would be offered a /Network version for
> just a $250 (cause, you know "listen", that's for servers, right?).
Jano, I am probably one who will pay for /Command, but you are right in one
thing - the way it is (and other languages offer this as standard feature
for free), we seem to end with numerous platform incompatible workarounds,
small utils (gates listening on one side to rebol, executin/calling the
stuff on another side), so the result will be much more bloat, chaos,
whatever ...
I was thinking about it for some time, if really RT don't want to move
/Shell or /Library into /Core for free, what about open source project? We
could probably implement multiplatform /Shell or even /Library ourselves. I
know it would require us still to run separate util, but the aproach would
be standard for all platform rebollers. I've never implemented C low level
stuff, but hey - in Delphi league language calling external app is the case
for just one line of code ('run in Visual Objects for e.g.). Doesn't realy
seem worth some 250 USD. That's also reason why I suggested per component
pricing. Maybe payint some 30USD for /Core + /Shell component would make
most of us happy, if we don't need to pay for /Library or /ODBC at the same
time .... But I don't think something is gonna change soon, so if some
clever C coder would like to start such project, we could implement external
util simulating /Shell or even /Library behavior ...
PS: I think it should not be considered as a step against RT, I just think
opposite - current state of things mean most of us will not probably buy the
functionality for some > 250 USD. And it means current state of things is
limiting REBOL usage and acceptance in computing world ...
... just a thought ...
Cheers,
-pekr-
[2/3] from: rishi:picostar at: 28-Sep-2000 8:20
What is Rebol/Shell? Is this an upcoming replacement for command line shells (ie. bash)?
Sounds
really interesting... I would like this...
Rishi
[3/3] from: petr:krenzelok:trz:cz at: 28-Sep-2000 18:24
----- Original Message -----
From: <[rishi--picostar--com]>
To: <[list--rebol--com]>
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 5:20 PM
Subject: [REBOL] Call for open-source project? Solution: Launch Programs
from REBOL/View Re:(3)
> What is Rebol/Shell? Is this an upcoming replacement for command line
shells (ie. bash)? Sounds
> really interesting... I would like this...
Ah, no - just look at probe system/components - you will see that even /View
is component to Core. So I like to refer to various components as to
/Library and /Shell, /ODBC etc. :-)
-pekr-
Notes
- Quoted lines have been omitted from some messages.
View the message alone to see the lines that have been omitted