Mailing List Archive: 49091 messages
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

Rebol Browser 4 Command Line RedHat Install

 [1/4] from: benminton:austarnet:au at: 26-Oct-2003 19:02


Hi All I recently migrated from Windows to RH 9.0 Linux but chose to perform a command line install. As I have not installed any of the X packages, I cannot install any sort of GUI type Web Browser. Although I can use Lynx, the text browser but it is very restrictive. Is it possible to use/build a small Rebol web browser of the most simple form, something to a standard of MS IE ver 3 or 4? Looking through the rebol community there are some excellent products and perhaps this issue has already been developed. I also downloaded Rebol Core & View for Linux and plan to use it above the command line linux. Looking forward to learning. Ben, Australia

 [2/4] from: tim:johnsons-web at: 26-Oct-2003 8:39


* Ben Minton <[benminton--austarnet--com--au]> [031026 01:51]:
> Hi All > I recently migrated from Windows to RH 9.0 Linux but
<<quoted lines omitted: 11>>
> I also downloaded Rebol Core & View for Linux and > plan to use it above the command line linux.
Hey Ben. I don't use view that much but I believe it needs 'X' to run. In fact I just tested it from a regular console. (didn't work) Why are you choosing not to install X?. The command line is available from X via any number of xterm consoles, and you can Ctrl-Alt F(n) to a number of 'real' consoles if you want - from X. BTW: This is slightly off-topic, but if you want a small browser, super-fast (but doesn't support frames), try Dillo. It is almost as fast as lynx. I use it for browsing documentation. Tim
> Looking forward to learning. > > Ben, Australia > -- > To unsubscribe from this list, just send an email to > [rebol-request--rebol--com] with unsubscribe as the subject.
-- Tim Johnson <[tim--johnsons-web--com]> http://www.alaska-internet-solutions.com

 [3/4] from: benminton::austarnet::com::au at: 27-Oct-2003 9:37


Hi Tim Thanks for the reply. No X ... because I run an older 486 and did not have the space for the full install. Also I wanted to 'learn' Linux not just point-and-click like windows. Yes, I have Lynx. Read about Dillo yesterday. Is it a non-X browser? Was not able to discern. Cheers, Ben

 [4/4] from: notofo:earthlink at: 26-Oct-2003 21:36


Ben Minton wrote:
>Yes, I have Lynx. Read about Dillo yesterday. Is it a >non-X browser? Was not able to discern. >
nope, dillo needs X. You would probably appreciate w3m as a text-mode browser, though...

Notes
  • Quoted lines have been omitted from some messages.
    View the message alone to see the lines that have been omitted